<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navicat MySQL: A Tool for Developers and DBAs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 04:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: error</title>
		<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>error</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://956281411#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Ive been using SQLYog for years and paid for the enterprise edition. Upgrade support expires after 1 year and if you miss an upgrade you miss an upgrade! My version cannot be updated and fails to dump some large tables. Since I will have to fork out some cash to get a newer version of SQLYog I thought I should look at the market.

Navicat trial version worked first time!

Since I have to pay to upgrade SQLYog (about the same as Navicat) then buying Navicat is a no-brainer for me. Navicat has a better (IMO) upgrade policy and the premium version (still very reasonable price) works for MYSql, Oracle and PostgreSQL.

Easy decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive been using SQLYog for years and paid for the enterprise edition. Upgrade support expires after 1 year and if you miss an upgrade you miss an upgrade! My version cannot be updated and fails to dump some large tables. Since I will have to fork out some cash to get a newer version of SQLYog I thought I should look at the market.</p>
<p>Navicat trial version worked first time!</p>
<p>Since I have to pay to upgrade SQLYog (about the same as Navicat) then buying Navicat is a no-brainer for me. Navicat has a better (IMO) upgrade policy and the premium version (still very reasonable price) works for MYSql, Oracle and PostgreSQL.</p>
<p>Easy decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://956281411#comment-86</guid>
		<description>hey guyz, i am a dba user. i have tried both navicat and sqlyog and also other mysql gui tools. Amongst all i vote for sqlyog which simply rocks with its best and improved stable features. you can have best try out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guyz, i am a dba user. i have tried both navicat and sqlyog and also other mysql gui tools. Amongst all i vote for sqlyog which simply rocks with its best and improved stable features. you can have best try out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fedmich</title>
		<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>fedmich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://956281411#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree. I love this program. Saved me a lot of hours uploading those really-really huge databases.

Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree. I love this program. Saved me a lot of hours uploading those really-really huge databases.</p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://www.willfitch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will.fitch</title>
		<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>will.fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://956281411#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Good post Mark.

I&#039;m personally not a fan of SQL Yog, and I paid for the enterprise version.  I found that it crashes with large sums of data brought back.

I do use HTTP tunneling with Navicat and it works beautifully.  To each their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Mark.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m personally not a fan of SQL Yog, and I paid for the enterprise version.  I found that it crashes with large sums of data brought back.</p>
<p>I do use HTTP tunneling with Navicat and it works beautifully.  To each their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://956281411#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I have tried both Sqlyog and Navicat. Initial impression was that Navicat had more features and followed &quot;Access&quot; like interface, so it was better.

However I kept the community version of Sqlyog and I was not disappointed. In terms of speed, sqlyog beats navicat all the way (try bringing a table with 10,000+ rows in the data grid). Moreover, my hosted MySQL server does not allow direct connection and Navicat over HTTP tunnel was non-functional.

Yes, Navicat has got some eye-candy as compared to Sqlyog, but I think the community edition of Sqlyog does &gt; 99% of my work, and since I sync my data to my laptop everyday I shelled out $50 to get an enterprise edition.

Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried both Sqlyog and Navicat. Initial impression was that Navicat had more features and followed &#8220;Access&#8221; like interface, so it was better.</p>
<p>However I kept the community version of Sqlyog and I was not disappointed. In terms of speed, sqlyog beats navicat all the way (try bringing a table with 10,000+ rows in the data grid). Moreover, my hosted MySQL server does not allow direct connection and Navicat over HTTP tunnel was non-functional.</p>
<p>Yes, Navicat has got some eye-candy as compared to Sqlyog, but I think the community edition of Sqlyog does &gt; 99% of my work, and since I sync my data to my laptop everyday I shelled out $50 to get an enterprise edition.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.willfitch.com/navicat-mysql-a-tool-for-developers-and-dbas.html#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://956281411#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Navicat MySql for about 3 months now and as far as I&#039;m concerned it blows all other clients I&#039;ve tried out of the water (admitedly, this would not be difficult).

It has some very nice features for importing and exporting tables and data that make it really usable. I find the user interface very clean and logical.

It still feels like a young product that has some way to go towards having a rich feature set, but a new upgrade is coming in 2007 that should add a lot to it. For the money I think it is well worth it and I&#039;m really pleased I paid for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Navicat MySql for about 3 months now and as far as I&#8217;m concerned it blows all other clients I&#8217;ve tried out of the water (admitedly, this would not be difficult).</p>
<p>It has some very nice features for importing and exporting tables and data that make it really usable. I find the user interface very clean and logical.</p>
<p>It still feels like a young product that has some way to go towards having a rich feature set, but a new upgrade is coming in 2007 that should add a lot to it. For the money I think it is well worth it and I&#8217;m really pleased I paid for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

